Title
Construction Management @ Risk Contracting Methodology - Wallace Kuralt Center Renovation
Action
ACTION:
Authorize the use of the Construction Management @ Risk (CM@Risk) contracting methodology for the Wallace Kuralt Center Renovation as the best construction contracting delivery method for the project.
Staff Contact: Martin Flores, Project Manager, Asset and Facility Management
Presentation: No
BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION:
In 2001, the General Assembly Session Law 2001-496 enacted Senate Bill 914 (revisions to G.S. 143-128) to provide construction flexibility for public entities by allowing the use, without limitation, of separate prime contracting, single prime contracting, dual bidding, Construction Management at Risk (CM@Risk), and alternative contracting methods authorized by the State Building Commission.
Effective October 1, 2014, the NC Legislature approved revisions to Section 143-128.1, requiring the comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the CM@Risk method, and a decision by the governing body that the CM@Risk method “is in the best interest of the project” before it can be used by a public entity for a project.
"(e) Construction Management at Risk services may be used by the public entity only after the public entity has concluded that construction management at risk services is in the best interest of the project, and the public entity has compared the advantages and disadvantages of using the construction management at risk method for a given project in lieu of the delivery methods identified in G.S.143-128(a1) (1) through G.S. 143-128(a1) (3). The public entity may not delegate this determination."
The office of Asset and Facility Management has developed the attached matrix comparing the traditional Design-Bid-Build contracting method to the CM@ Risk method.
With the Construction Management at Risk (CM@Risk) project delivery method, the construction manager assists the County with scheduling, constructab...
Click here for full text